The Outlook

This isn't for the sensitive

How Race Slowed the Investigation of a Double Homicide

I love crime shows, especially crime docs like Forensic Files and Cold Case Files.  Lately I’ve been watching a show on Netflix called Crime 360.  In this reality show, cameras follow the investigation of homicides that are solved in part by using technology that allows crime techs to “freeze” a crime scene just as it is at the time of discovery for use later if detectives need to see the scene for some purpose after clean-up at the actual site has occurred.

Over the course of 2 seasons, the show was filmed in Richmond, VA; Indianapolis, IN; Rochester, NY and Cleveland, OH.  I’ve been watching for several days now, about an episode a day, and I quickly realized that approximately 90-95% of the victims were of color (mostly black) and with the exception of the episode I’m about to discuss, 100% of the perps were of color (mostly black).  All of the victims have been male and young and “in that life” as well as the perps.  To a certain degree I believe I’ve continued to watch this show just to see how many black men are killing other black men and how much of that a television show would air.

You have to wonder how many homicide investigations they filmed and how they chose to air the ones they chose to air.  Two episodes I watched back-to-back were almost completely opposite in every way, except for the city they were filmed in; both were in Indianapolis.

In the first episode we come up on a homicide of a young black male.  It appears that a shootout between two groups of people occurred and the victim was shot during that time.  He managed to run to a back alley where he collapsed and died.  The investigation went just as several others had gone: the lead investigator rounded up any possible witnesses and questioned them, came up with a list of suspects, and continued to use physical and forensic evidence to help him guide where he looked for more information until finally he was able to determine who shot the victim.

In the second episode, we come upon a double homicide of 2 older white males.  Both are retired professionals and we learn (needlessly, I think) that they are gay (homophobia actually runs a bit rampant in this show, but that’s a topic for another post).  Just like the prior episode and most of the others, the lead detective gathers witnesses and uses evidence to figure out where to go next in his search.

Both episodes end with the arrests of the suspect(s) but one takes a bit longer than the other to solve and I believe it has to do with race.

In the first episode a bystander is quickly brought downtown under serious suspicion of involvement.  It is believed that because he was standing close to the victim’s body when investigators and police arrived on the scene that he may have had something to do with the shooting.  The “person of interest,” a black male, gives a very plausible story that he and his friend (the victim) had been at a park earlier in the day.  He says that he and his friend and some of his friend’s friends left the area about the same time, but in different directions.  He says suddenly he hears shots and he takes of running.  He returns when the fire ceases and finds his friend in the middle of a group of people, dead on the ground.  The investigator is very suspicious of this story and reluctant to let the witness go, though he ultimately has to because he has no reason to hold him.

In the second episode, two men enter the victims’ home because one of them, a supposed close friend  of the roommates, realizes he has not seen them in several weeks.  This individual serves as an early witness who is also brought down to the station to give information to police.  He, a white male, is not seen as a person of interest.  He explains that he realized he hadn’t seen his friends in a few weeks and asked another neighbor to accompany him into the house.  They found a back window that was half open and used it to enter the home where the witness discovered the bodies.  He also adds that interestingly, a few days prior to this discovery, he got an anonymous message on his phone (it is never clarified whether this was voice or text) to retrieve one of the victims’ vans from a store parking lot.  He explains further that the men never lent their vehicles to other people and so investigators assume that whoever took the van killed the men.  They thank the witness and he is allowed to go.

I’m not a terribly suspicious person.  In fact, I’m much more liable to believe someone than to not believe them if we don’t have any history or I don’t have any real tangible reason not to.  I typically would just rather believe you than go through the trouble of suspecting you, but that second witness?  Oh he sounded to me like he was lying from the word go.  Everything just seemed so… planned.  This half-open window, and especially this van!  My mind was boggled as to why the investigators didn’t seem the least bit suspicious that this man got some random message on his phone to go retrieve a van that was a crucial piece of evidence!  I mean who in their right mind wants to get away with a crime and directs someone to something that could convict them?  I also wondered why no one asked the witness to produce the message so they could follow up.

Turns out that in the first case, the witness was telling the truth and had nothing at all to do with the shooting.  However in the second case the witness who’s less-than-probably story we believed turned out not only to be involved, but to be the perpetrator.  After a tip from another neighbor, the investigators determine he had a fairly intense rap sheet himself, including aggravated robbery.  Because it took so long to unearth evidence that he had not been completely forthright and also had his own criminal past, he had time to leave the city and make it cross-country before they found him.  I couldn’t help but ponder how differently that might have gone had he been a black man.

I’ve seen enough of these to tell you that police are generally suspicious people and with good reason. Several times I thought a witness was being truthful only to find that with just a few more pointed questions, their stories unraveled.  But almost all of those witnesses have been black and they’ve had information on black suspects involved in black murders.  I think it makes sense to wonder why a witness with questionable information wasn’t made a person of interest much sooner than in this case.

I’m not at all accusing the investigator of this “white” crime of racism.  I surely don’t have enough evidence, having never seen him work a “black” case.  He might just be a little inept in the investigating department, but I do think race is at least one piece of why one witness was questioned more harshly and much longer than another who turned out to be a suspect.

What do you think?  Am I off base?  The interesting thing here is perception.  As a person who is forced to pay attention to and think about how race works in our society, every day these things stand out to me a little more.  I think one could cloak this in class instead of race as many are apt to do, I think others could out and out deny that race plays any part.  Perhaps, some might say, the black witness was treated more harshly because of his own history.  All of these theories, including mine, have an equal chance of being true but I stand behind what I’ve said.  The black witness was treated much more skeptically than the white one and it had everything to do with the race of the two.


December 23, 2011 Posted by | Race, TV Shows, Uncategorized | , , | 2 Comments

Lincoln Heights

All this talk of Tyler Perry v. Spike Lee got me thinking…

A commenter on A Belle in Brooklyn’s post on this issue, Butterscotch Baby, said

With the cancellations of Everybody Hates Chris, Chocolate News, and possibly The Game, all I’m left with is Lincoln Heights.

I love Lincoln Heights and I’ve been watching it since it first premiered on ABCFamily. It’s a lesser known show on a niche market cable channel, but it’s a good one.

Lincoln Heights is a show about a family, the Suttons, who move back to “the Heights” when the father, Eddie, a police officer, decides he should live where he works. Lincoln Heights is not necessarily the safest community, but it is a community filled with people who remember when the neighborhood was safer and who want it to go back to that. We’re introduced to Eddie’s wife, Jenn who is a nurse and helps to open up a free-clinic in the neighborhood, their 3 kids, Cassandra (Cassie), Elizabeth (Lizzie) and Taylor (Tay) who are all wary of a move into a crime-filled neighborhood.

Now in it’s 4th season, we’ve seen a lot happen to the Suttons, including their house almost destroyed by an earthquake, kidnappings, fights and even a serious relationship between Cassie and her boyfriend Charles. The show isn’t different from many of the dramatic family-oriented shows we’re used to, except that the Suttons are a black family and Lincoln Heights, at the center of everything, is a black neighborhood.

I’m intrigued by a few things. Firstly, Lincoln Heights has been on air since 2006 and it’s still not getting a lot of play in the black community. That means the people watching it are white, which isn’t necessarily surprising since ABCFamily is a network oriented less towards the African-American demographic than the white demographic. Secondly, even in light of us losing shows like The Game, Everybody Hates Chris and Girlfriends black folks still aren’t discovering Lincoln Heights. Despite our claims that we’ve not seen a nuclear black family since the Cosbys, Lincoln Heights still isn’t getting any airtime in black households.

According to a report done by Media Reports the actual group that’s keeping LH on the air are teenagers. Most recent numbers show that ratings hover near or above 1% for the 12 – 17 demographic. In other words, about 30,000 12 – 17 year olds in the country watch Lincoln Heights. Typically reports on “who’s watching what” are done in terms of age. For the most part, advertisers concern themselves more with how old audiences are, than their race — which makes sense. Ford, for example, wouldn’t really want to advertise to a bunch of under-18 year olds who most likely can’t purchase a car, while Mattel might not be interested in advertising to an audience of over-20 when they’re pitching their new Barbies.

That being said, when we start talking about minority-starring shows, we can assume that their audiences, to a large degree, are a homogenous bunch, racially. LH stands out because they appeal to a teenage crowd, across the racial spectrum. A lot of kids see themselves in Cassie, Lizzie and Tay — even if those characters don’t look like them. Many fans absolutely love Cassie and Charles (Chassie as they’ve been named by the fans) together and are worried that the writers are going to break them up. Others identify with the way Lizzie is still trying to fit in in her new high school and others identify with Tay’s struggles as the baby boy.

What the writers have done with this show is amazing. The Cosby’s had crossover appeal because there was a certain level of race-neutralizing worked in. There wasn’t a terrible amount of discussions about their race, which worked. At that time, black folks were just happy to see them on television. Lincoln Heights has dealt with race repeatedly: Charles is white and, as we know, Cassie is black. Lizzie is dating a Hispanic guy and while we haven’t seen any issues for Lizzie and her boyfriend yet, Chassie started having problems almost immediately. For one year, Lizzie took an opportunity to go to a private school where she found it hard to make real friends because the kids either assumed she was there on a basketball scholarship and was stupid, or only wanted to be her friend because “black people are cool…” I felt like that storyline was so important — it’s a form of ignorance that is often overlooked.

I hope that more black households pick up on Lincoln Heights. It’s important that we support the shows that are doing what we want them to do so that we have more clout when we complain that there aren’t enough of those shows.

Check out some clips (or entire episodes) of Lincoln Heights on ABC Family’s website. But more importantly, WATCH IT. Mondays, 8pm EST, ABC Family.

October 28, 2009 Posted by | Entertainment, Review, TV Shows | | Leave a comment

Tyler Perry

2 posts on this blog in one day. Wow. Major record.

In this video, Tyler Perry discusses some of the criticism he’s recieved from people concerning some of the characters he has created, including Madea and Mr. Brown.

I feel what Tyler says here and I completely agree. As I said on Twitter:

 Black ppl have 2 STOP thinking every movie w/ black ppl in it has 2 reflect them

Over the last 30 years, we’ve seen quite a few types of black movies, ranging from Blaxploitation to movies about life in the hood. From stories of the upper echelon of black folks, to the very bottom. All types of black people have been portrayed, sometimes correctly, other times in correctly, in Hollywood.

I won’t go into the issue of whether or not black people are represented enough in Hollywood, because the answer is simple: we are not. The issue I have is this idea that black people seem to have that when they go watch a film starring/about black people, they are supposed to see themselves (and their 3 friends). That isn’t realistic. You and your 3 friends = 4 people, who are by no means representative of an entire group. I know we’d all love to see more films with black people of all types in it, the way we feel like we see films with all types of white people in them. I’d actually argue that there are plenty of groups of white people who are horridly under/mis-represented in film, but that’s another topic.

What Tyler Perry has long been able to do is make his plays relatable to his fanbase. TP figured out early on that there was a certain demographic within the black community who identified with his characters. They had a grandmother like Madea, an uncle like Mr. Brown. They too had a crackhead in their family, or had also dealt with spousal abuse. When they watch his plays and his films, they see themselves and their families. Those are the targets, for him.

If you don’t see yourself in any Tyler Perry film, that’s ok. Maybe his films aren’t for you. I don’t identify completely with Spike Lee’s “School Daze;” in fact, this film doesn’t describe my college experience at all, but I respect it not only because it’s a classic or because it’s a good film, but because there are many African-Americans who do see themselves in “Do The Right Thing” or “Crooklyn” or “School Daze” or any other Spike Lee Film. In fact, many black people didn’t like Spike Lee’s “Bamboozled” because they missed what he was trying to say. While not exactly the same, many people miss what Tyler Perry is trying to do: draw in an audience that is under/mis-represented in Hollywood with as he says, “disarming, funny, charming bait” and then he’s able to make larger points about God and love and relationships, for example.

There are plenty who argue that it’s not about who these films are or aren’t for, but that they gross so much money and make so much news on the backs of caricatures of black people that have been used for decades to degrade and humiliate an entire race of people. Look, I’ll be honest — if these movies were made by white filmmakers, we’d all be pissed and rightfully so. But that’s because there’s no way films like these could be made honestly. The caricatures and exaggerations that we reference when we call something “coonery” or “buffonery” are based on completely false stereotypes. Tyler Perry may exaggerate some things, but his characters are based stiffly and assuredly in someone’s truth, and if it’s not my truth I can be ok that it is’s someone’s truth.

Amos & Andy… (click the picture for more info on Amos and Andy’s history)

were not someone’s truth. They were completely falsified creations made up in a white man’s world based on the things white people thought were true about black people. Tyler Perry’s characters are based on people he knows, and if we’re all honest, people we know.

I think we need to get off Tyler Perry. He’s doing a lot of things no other black filmmaker has been able to do and I think it’s largely in part because he focused on a demographic that is incredibly loyal but had long been overlooked by most of Hollywood, even the black filmmakers. We can’t be upset with him for doing what no one else would and succeeding.

October 26, 2009 Posted by | Entertainment, Movies | | 1 Comment

What I’m Listening To

In the past month I’ve purchased the following albums:
Lifehouse — Who We Are    Who We Are album cover
Queen Latifah — Trav’lin Light    Trav’lin Light album cover

Keyshia Cole — Just Like You  Just Like You album cover
Maroon 5 — It Won’t Be Soon Before Long It Won’t Be Soon Before Long
Rascal Flatts — Me and My Gang  Me and My Gang album cover

I love them all, though I wasn’t particularly ready for Queen Latifah’s album. The Dana Owens album was hot, but I didn’t buy it. I probably will now, though. Trav’lin Light, despite what other reviewers may have said, is mostly a jazz album. Queen does a great job…. but I still like the Dana Owens album better.

Maroon 5’s new album is NOT getting great reviews from fans. If you liked their first album, Songs About Jane, it’s a toss-up to whether or not you’ll like this one. They’re experimenting, going for more of a soul feel than SAJ had. I love it, but it took two and a half listens for me to really decide that.

Keyshia Cole is continuing with her “woe is me, I hate men” motif, but you gotta do what works. Considering she’s been called the next Mary J. Blige, she’s right on track (MJB’s first few albums, as we ALL know, were primarily about pain… that’s all you know when you’re a crackhead). I didn’t get Keyshia’s first album so I can’t compare, but this one is hot. I wasn’t impressed with a)The fact that they included Diddy’s “Last Night” on the album as a “real” track, instead of a bonus one and b)That the “Let Go” album version is the one with the shortened Lil’ Kim rap which is such a rip-off… and they wonder why people download illegally.

Lifehouse’s new album is a little darker around the edges, but very reminiscent of “No Name Face.” It’s good. Period.

Rascal Flatts’ Me and My Gang is not their newest album, and as usual they’re getting a lot of flack for not being hardcore country, but who cares? I like it, it’s quality and I got what I paid for.

November 27, 2007 Posted by | Music, Review | Leave a comment

Danny Tanner was not gay

I’ve never seen an entire Bob Saget stand up; I’m not sure I”d laugh, but I did catch this little gem at the end of his stand-up routine on TV. Enjoy!

October 26, 2007 Posted by | Entertainment, Guilty Pleasures, Video | Leave a comment

What is going on?

I saw this video and others like it discussed on ABC News’ “i-Caught”

These are detainees in the Philippines  doing the Thriller dance. Why, you might ask? Because their warden thinks it’s good exercise. And it is, but I think he makes ’em do it for his own enjoyment. It’s causing a bit of an uproar, but hey — it is entertaining and anytime some people other than black folks are making a coonery of themselves, I’m happy.

August 14, 2007 Posted by | Entertainment, What in sam hell is going on?! | Leave a comment


I like country music. Brad Paisley released this song about 3 or 4 years ago — I think it’s very much appropriate these days, in light of the likes of Lindsay Lohan, Britney Spears (which, considering how Christina Aguilera was always labeled as the “bad girl” of pop, is very interesting), Paris Hilton, and the list goes on and on…

August 10, 2007 Posted by | Guilty Pleasures, Music | Leave a comment

Of Course There’s A Remix!

Just heard the remix to Eve’s Tambourine. Except for that tired little kid/man voice Swizz insists on using in his songs, and Swizz’s own verse, the remix is hot — ’cause Missy’s on it. I won’t lie, I HEART Missy Elliott. She is FIRE! Here’s the bootleg youtube video for it (read: there is no REAL video, just a picture with the audio) 

 Eve actually sounds happy to be doing a track this go-round. And I always appreciate a good remix. That means the artist went back in the studio and REMIXED the track. Destiny’s Child — Say My Name (remix) f/Timbaland… that’s the definition of a remix. Whoo Lordy. They just don’t make ’em like they used to.

August 10, 2007 Posted by | FIRE!, Music | Leave a comment

Guilty Pleasure

So. I won’t lie. I have many guilty pleasures. I feell ike I should share them with you from time to time.

First up, “Crank Dat” by Souljaboy. I mean, who doesn’t like seeing people hop back in forth in line formation while screaming “YOOOOOOOOOUUU”? That’s right, no one — especially not me.

I tape the Young and the Restless E’RDAY, and I’m not afraid (well, not anymore) to share that fact with the rest of the world. Go on. Check out the montage.


August 10, 2007 Posted by | Guilty Pleasures, Music, TV Shows | Leave a comment